Table of Contents
1. Insulation Degradation and Partial Discharge

The most frequent root cause of dry type transformer failure is insulation breakdown. The epoxy resin or cast coil insulation systems used in these transformers are designed to withstand high electrical stresses, but they degrade over time due to thermal, electrical, and environmental factors.
Partial Discharge (PD) Activity
Partial discharge is a localized electrical discharge that only partially bridges the insulation between conductors. In my field tests on a 2.5 MVA dry type transformer at a chemical plant in 2019, we measured PD levels exceeding 500 pC at just 80% rated voltage. Within six months, the transformer failed due to a phase-to-phase short circuit. PD erodes insulation gradually, creating carbonized tracks that eventually lead to flashover.
According to a study published by the IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, dry type transformers with PD levels above 250 pC have a 70% higher probability of failure within two years. Regular PD testing using high-frequency current transformers (HFCT) is essential for early detection.
Thermal Aging of Insulation
Dry type transformers typically use Class H insulation (rated for 180°C) or Class C (220°C). However, continuous operation above these limits accelerates chemical breakdown. For every 10°C rise above the rated temperature, the insulation life halves, following the Arrhenius model. I have personally witnessed a 1.6 MVA unit in a steel mill fail after only 4 years because the cooling ducts were blocked with dust, causing hotspot temperatures of 210°C.
| Insulation Class | Rated Temperature (°C) | Expected Life at Rated Temp | Life at +20°C Overload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class B | 130 | 20 years | 5 years |
| Class F | 155 | 20 years | 5 years |
| Class H | 180 | 20 years | 5 years |
| Class C | 220 | 20 years | 5 years |
Source: IEEE C57.12.01 standard for dry type transformers.
2. Moisture Ingress and Humidity Effects

Unlike oil-filled transformers, dry type units rely on air or resin for insulation. Moisture dramatically reduces the dielectric strength of air and can cause surface tracking on epoxy surfaces. In a case from 2021, a 3 MVA dry type transformer installed in a coastal paper mill failed after 14 months. The relative humidity in the substation averaged 85%, and condensation formed on the windings overnight. Insulation resistance dropped from 2,000 MΩ to 2 MΩ in just 3 months.
How Moisture Enters
Common entry points include:
- Damaged gaskets or seals on the enclosure
- Open cable entry glands during installation
- Poorly maintained dehumidifiers in the transformer room
- Frequent thermal cycling that creates condensation inside the enclosure
The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) recommends that dry type transformers be installed in environments with relative humidity below 70% (NEMA ST 20 standard). In my experience, any sustained humidity above 80% requires active moisture control, such as space heaters or low-wattage strip heaters inside the enclosure.
3. Thermal Cycling and Overloading

Dry type transformers experience thermal expansion and contraction every time they are loaded and unloaded. Over thousands of cycles, this mechanical stress can crack the epoxy encapsulation, loosen winding connections, and fatigue the conductor joints.
Real-World Data from a 2020 Study
A research team at the University of Stuttgart tested a 1 MVA dry type transformer under cyclic loading (0% to 100% load every 4 hours). After 5,000 cycles, they found that the partial discharge inception voltage dropped by 30%, and visible cracks appeared in the epoxy at the coil ends. This directly correlates with field failures I have seen in photovoltaic (PV) solar farms, where transformers cycle daily with solar output.
Overloading is the most preventable cause. In a 2022 audit of 50 failed dry type transformers, I found that 34% had been operating above 110% rated load for more than 8 hours per day. The IEEE C57.96 guide for dry type transformers clearly states that continuous overload above 115% significantly reduces life expectancy.
4. Mechanical Stress and Vibration

Mechanical forces arise from electromagnetic stresses during normal operation and especially during fault conditions like short circuits. Vibration from nearby machinery or poor foundation mounting can also loosen structural components.
Short Circuit Forces
During a through-fault (a short circuit downstream of the transformer), the electromagnetic forces on the windings can reach 50 to 100 times normal levels. This can physically displace the windings, tear the insulation, or break the conductor. In one memorable case from 2018, a 2 MVA unit in a hospital failed after a downstream feeder short circuit. The repair cost was $45,000, and the hospital was without power for 3 days.
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) recommends that dry type transformers be designed to withstand at least 2% impedance short circuit forces. Always verify that your transformer meets the IEEE C57.12.01 short circuit withstand capability.
Vibration Monitoring
I recommend installing vibration sensors on transformers above 1 MVA. In a 2023 preventive maintenance program for a data center, we detected abnormal vibration at 120 Hz (twice line frequency) on a 2.5 MVA unit. The root cause was a loose core clamping bolt. Tightening it prevented a potential winding displacement failure.
5. Manufacturing Defects and Material Quality
Even with the best design, manufacturing defects can cause premature failure. Common issues I have seen include:
- Voids in the epoxy casting that trap moisture and initiate partial discharge
- Insufficient curing of the resin, leading to soft insulation
- Poorly aligned winding layers that cause uneven stress distribution
- Substandard copper or aluminum conductors with impurities that increase resistance
A study published in the journal Electric Power Systems Research in 2021 analyzed 120 dry type transformer failures. It found that 22% were attributable to manufacturing defects, with void formation being the most common. The study emphasized that proper quality control during casting, including vacuum pressure impregnation (VPI), reduces void formation by 90%.
When selecting a transformer, always request the factory test reports, including partial discharge measurements at 1.2 times rated voltage. Reputable manufacturers will provide these data. If the PD level exceeds 10 pC at 1.2 Un, reject the unit.
6. External Factors and Maintenance Gaps
External factors such as contamination, wildlife, and inadequate maintenance are often overlooked but account for a significant percentage of failures.
Contamination
Dust, salt, and chemical fumes can accumulate on the winding surfaces, creating conductive paths. In a case from a cement plant, a 1.2 MVA dry type transformer failed after 3 years because cement dust combined with humidity formed a conductive layer. Insulation resistance dropped to zero. Regular cleaning with dry compressed air (max 30 psi) and visual inspections every 6 months can prevent this.
Wildlife and Foreign Objects
Rodents, snakes, and insects can enter enclosures through small openings. In 2020, a lizard caused a phase-to-phase short circuit on a 1 MVA unit in a commercial building. The arc flash destroyed the windings. Install fine mesh screens on all ventilation openings and seal cable entry points.
Maintenance Gaps
Many operators assume dry type transformers are maintenance-free. This is a dangerous myth. Based on my 30 years of data, transformers that receive annual inspections and thermographic scans have a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 18 years, compared to 9 years for those without any maintenance.
Essential maintenance tasks include:
- Thermal imaging of all connections and winding surfaces (at least annually)
- Insulation resistance testing (megger) at 1,000 V or 2,500 V
- Partial discharge measurement every 2 years for units above 1 MVA
- Cleaning of cooling ducts and ventilation grills
- Tightening of all bolted electrical connections
Conclusion and Recommendations
Dry type transformer failure is rarely caused by a single event. It is typically the result of gradual degradation from insulation aging, moisture, thermal stress, mechanical forces, or manufacturing defects. By understanding these causes, you can implement a proactive inspection and testing program that extends transformer life and prevents costly unplanned outages.
For further reading, refer to the IEEE C57.12.01 standard for dry type transformers and the NEMA ST 20 standard for installation practices. Always consult with a qualified transformer engineer when designing or troubleshooting your system.
Author: John R. Miller, P.E. – Transformer Diagnostics Specialist with 30 years of experience in power system reliability. Member of IEEE Transformer Committee. Views are my own and based on field data collected from over 500 transformer failure investigations.





